Atopic Dermatitis and the Risk of Infection in End-Stage Renal Disease.

Background and Objectives: Atopic dermatitis (AD), also known as eczema, is a common chronic inflammatory skin condition affecting 16.5 million adults in the United States. AD is characterized by an impaired epidermal barrier that can predispose individuals to infection. End-stage renal disease (ESRD) is also commonly complicated by infections due to chronic vascular access and immune-system dysfunction, possibly related to uremia. Multiple studies have reported that renal disease is a common comorbidity in adults with atopic dermatitis. The aim of this study was to determine whether AD is a risk factor for certain infections in patients with ESRD. Materials and Methods: Using the United States Renal Data System, a retrospective cohort analysis was conducted on adult ESRD patients initiating dialysis between 2004 and 2019 to investigate associations between infections and AD in this population. Results: Of 1,526,266 patients, 2290 were identified with AD (0.2%). Infectious outcomes of interest were bacteremia, septicemia, cellulitis, herpes zoster, and conjunctivitis. In all infectious outcomes except for conjunctivitis, patients with the infectious outcomes were more likely to carry a diagnosis of AD. After controlling for demographic and clinical covariates, AD was associated with an increased risk of cellulitis (adjusted relative risk (aRR) = 1.39, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.31-1.47) and herpes zoster (aRR = 1.67, CI = 1.44-1.94), but not with bacteremia (aRR = 0.96, CI = 0.89-1.05), septicemia (aRR = 1.02, CI = 0.98-1.08), or conjunctivitis (aRR = 0.97, CI = 0.740-1.34). Conclusions: Overall, after controlling for demographic and clinical covariates and adjusting for person-years-at-risk, AD was associated with an increased risk for some, but not all, infections within the population of patients with ESRD.

Use of technology in evidence-based programs for child maltreatment and its impact on parent and child outcomes.

Introduction: Technology has been used in evidence-based child maltreatment (CM) programs for over a decade. Although advancements have been made, the extent of the application of technology in these programs, and its influence on parental and child outcomes, remains unclear within the context of changes that emerged because of the COVID-19 pandemic. This scoping review provides a contextualized overview and summary of the use of technology in evidence-based parenting and child programs serving families impacted by child maltreatment and the effects of technology-enhanced programs on target outcomes. Materials and methods: Using Arksey and O'Malley's methodological framework, we searched seven databases to identify peer-reviewed and grey literature published in English from 2000 to 2023 on evidence-based programs, according to the California Evidence-Based Clearinghouse (CEBC), that included technological supports for two populations: at-risk parents for child maltreatment prevention, and children and youth 0-18 years exposed to child maltreatment. All study designs were included. Results: Eight evidence-based parenting programs and one evidence-based child trauma program were identified as using technology across a total of 25 peer-reviewed articles and 2 peer-reviewed abstracts meeting inclusion criteria (n = 19 on parent-level programs; n = 8 on child-level programs). Four studies were published in the context of COVID-19. Two main uses of technology emerged: (1) remote programmatic delivery (i.e., delivering all or part of the program virtually using technology) and (2) programmatic enhancement (i.e., augmenting program content with technology). Improvements across parenting and child mental health and behavioral outcomes were generally observed. Discussion: Technology use in evidence-based child maltreatment programs is not new; however, the small sample since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic in this review that met inclusion criteria highlight the dearth of research published on the topic. Findings also suggest the need for the inclusion of implementation outcomes related to adoption and engagement, which could inform equitable dissemination and implementation of these programs. Additional considerations for research and practice are discussed.